``` "On the Shoot the Monkey Demonstration"
Regarding an intuitive explanation to the shoot the monkey demonstration.  One
of your class mates (Daniel M. Drucker) has provided one of sufficient merrit that I quote
it for you below.
D. Drucker 2/2000  "If I fire the gun at the monkey with g=0, the bullet will
travel along a straight line. The trajectory always points towards the monkey, because the
monkey doesn't fall under g=0.
Now, I add some gravity, which applies equally to the monkey and the bullet.
Watch the trajectory again, and while the bullet doesn't travel along a straight line with
respect to the hunter's reference frame, it *does* travel along a straight line with respect
to the MONKEY'S reference frame.
To put it another way, consider the bullet to instead be a guided missile pointed at
a monkey in zero gravity (poor monkey!). We give the missile an initial X velocity by
firing it from the gun. As soon as the missile is
fired, the monkey says "uh oh!" and takes evasive action by accelerating in the Y
direction. But the missile is *smart* -- it sees the monkey's escape, and (instantly) starts
firing its Y-axis engines to match the monkey's acceleration.  The downward-component
of the monkey's Y-motion is always matched by the downward-component of the
missile's Y-motion (even when the missile's upward-component is greater) and thus the
monkey is blown to ...."   Daniel Drucker

Note added by M. Croft 2/2000
The above explanation utilizes an accelerating (or "non-inertial") reference frame.
Such reference frames are typically (perhaps too often) avoided since, to paraphrase
Einstein, the laws of physics must be the same in all inertial reference frames.  Keeping
Newton's Second Law (F=ma) "the same" requires that one avoid accelerating reference
frames (no extra accelerations or "fictitious forces" introduced due to the reference frame).
However, how the laws must be modified to jump to an accelerating reference frame are
well defined and sometimes very useful as illustrated by the shot the monkey discussion.
Let us take this discussion one step farther.  Suppose one is abducted by aliens
and taken (sedated) into deep space, far from any gravitational force sources.  If the space
ship is at rest, or in constant velocity motion, you (and all inside) would feel weightless.
Now suppose the aliens want to wake you up and observe you while fooled into thinking
you are still on earth.  They carefully set up a shoot the monkey demonstration.  At the
instant just after the bullet leaves the gun and the "monkey" lets go of its tree the aliens
:fire their rocket motors to impart precisely a=+9.8m/s2; and wake you up instantly.  You
feel your weight (-mg) you see the monkey fall with g = -9.8m/s2, you see the bullet
follow a parabolic trajectory (consistent with g = -9.8m/s2) and strike the "monkey" just
as in your old physics class.  You think you are confused but on earth.
Of course, an observer outside the space craft sees the monkey remain motionless
(he let go of the branch before the rocket fired), and the bullet travel in a straight line (it
had cleared the muzzle just before the rocket fired ) to hit the monkey.  The observer sees
you, and the floor on which you rest, accelerating at a=+9.8 m/s2 upward toward the
monkey and the bullet.
This is a classic example of Einstein's Equivalence Principle from which he
formed his theory of General Relativity (the theory of gravity in terms of the curvature of
space).  The Equivalence Principle basically says that, experiments in the presence of
mass and a gravitational interaction must be equivalent to those carried out with no
gravity, but in a reference frame having the precise acceleration needed to simulate the
gravitational field.  In this formulation the path of light, the quanta of which (photons)
have no mass, also follows a curved path in a gravitational field as they must in an
accelerating reference frame.  Thus the intuition involved here is the kind that Einstein
used to revolutionize physics at the beginning of the 20th century. . ```